Respect for your opponents
- lemonheadiv
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
- Posts: 560
- Thank you received: 5
The krec speaks for itself; I got a reaction which would be unjustified from any player as far as I m concerned, even more considering it comes from an organizer.
- lemonheadiv
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
- Posts: 560
- Thank you received: 5
congrats, organizer
Of course someone could say : maybe he had a bad day, I don t see anything really bad here ; I suggest someone to do the same thing and see the outcome (Results may vary).
Maybe someone couldn t be too concerned or bothered because in the end he won the game, however it s not about the result I think...
That s a bad touch to ISSF reputation.
- Rock and Roll
- Offline
- Moderator
- Posts: 2485
- Thank you received: 1
In this case, if an action is warranted, then it should be by Schulle in my opinion. Not by me.
I didn t ignore it on purpose, I just didn t think I was the one who should reply.
I apologize if we got this wrong.
If the general consensus is that we should always investigate these matters, then I/we will in future.
- Retrieving
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 828
- Thank you received: 1
In this case I felt (as an ISSF admin/committee member) it was better to leave this matter to be sorted out by the players themselves and / or the site admins, not the ISSF admins. Especially seeing as one of the players is himself one of the two big bosses of ISSF
In this case, if an action is warranted, then it should be by Schulle in my opinion. Not by me.
I didn t ignore it on purpose, I just didn t think I was the one who should reply.
I apologize if we got this wrong.
If the general consensus is that we should always investigate these matters, then I/we will in future.
The thing is, had this been anybody else (barring those 3-4 oldschoolers who run the site and their buddies) he would ve been lynched right away and we d be reading a 30+ replies long thread with a bunch of pitchforks-holding-people circlejerking each other and going at great lenght to blame his attitude, conduct and lack of fairplay, lol. ;D
well, sorry for the result...all I can say is take it easy
There was no arrogance whatsoever in the above statement...to me it looks like Lemonhead was just feeling genuinely sorry for the outcome of the match (own goals and all).
In fact it seems like he respected the opponent to the point he wished for a closer match...and that s it.
So yeah, kinda uncalled for on Schulle s part. He clearly misunderstood Lemon s intentions entirely, especially if the ***** is supposed to be an insult.
Nothing big, don t get me wrong, stuff like this is bound to happen between people who are relying on a second language to communicate with each other, Lemon however is definitely due for an apology here.
The thing is, had this been anybody else (barring those 3-4 oldschoolers who run the site and their buddies) he would ve been lynched right away and we d be reading a 30+ replies long thread with a bunch of pitchforks-holding-people circlejerking each other and going at great lenght to blame his attitude, conduct and lack of fairplay, lol. ;D
Despite the smiley (which shall indicate any sort of humor?!), this is a pretty much baseless assumption.
Please omit those kind of unfounded assertions. They only cause confusion for no good reason.
Ah, and it is a topic which is from september and thus some (or better long ) time ago.
But nice to see people, at least I am only talking about mt653, sticking around in old graves...
- Retrieving
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 828
- Thank you received: 1
(which shall indicate any sort of humor?!),
Yes, it s sarcasm and it s supposed to be funny lol, thought the smiley gave it away already.