Difference in Amiga and PC SWOS!
- Marin Parushev
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 301
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 3 weeks ago #19262
by Marin Parushev
Difference in Amiga and PC SWOS! was created by Marin Parushev
Ever since I started playing amiga Online I ve been told that in amiga and in PC SWOS everything is the same (of course except the gameplay which slightly differs). However, I found something that shows that not everything is the same. Here are 2 screenshots - 1 amiga and 1 PC SWOS.
In both screenshots the team of Brazil is selected and the 2 defenders Aldair and Ronaldao are swapped. In amiga only Aldair gets an X while in PC SWOS Ronaldao gets a tic when put into Aldair s initial position. What is the reason for that? I still don t know but I suppose that the 4-4-2 tactic in amiga and in PC may slightly differ cause Ronaldao to like his new position in PC SWOS.
In both screenshots the team of Brazil is selected and the 2 defenders Aldair and Ronaldao are swapped. In amiga only Aldair gets an X while in PC SWOS Ronaldao gets a tic when put into Aldair s initial position. What is the reason for that? I still don t know but I suppose that the 4-4-2 tactic in amiga and in PC may slightly differ cause Ronaldao to like his new position in PC SWOS.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 years 3 weeks ago #19263
by Playaveli
Replied by Playaveli on topic Re: Difference in Amiga and PC SWOS!
I
I think that may be the solution! The movement of players differs a bit due to the gameplay. But I don t know for sure! Postions in tactics are the same (must be) because otherwise you couldn t use a PC tactic on Amiga and vice versa.
(of course except the gameplay which slightly differs).
I think that may be the solution! The movement of players differs a bit due to the gameplay. But I don t know for sure! Postions in tactics are the same (must be) because otherwise you couldn t use a PC tactic on Amiga and vice versa.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.222 seconds