Re: Sensible Days 2007

BTW, nothing is changed: the organizer set the rules, as always, that s what we did and you could read the rules for months on the website. You can like it or not, but please judge after the event, if you like. We think we know what s the best and you should respect it.

Please say that from the beginning on. And I d rather like to have that added We think we know what s the best for our tournament [...] and noone will disrespect this.

OoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooK ...

I must say a bit also...

First of all, i don´t like the DIY-League ! But it´s only MY OPINION !!! 

Second thing , i don´t like to play vs. Players with custom tactics! But this is also MY OPINION !!! 

Never mind , i come to the Sensi-Days ! When it happen to me, that 3 of my Players are injured, i can start to drink earlier  ;D

I think, i get some kicks in my ass because of the tactic thing , and maybe a few more because of injured players ! Why not !

The only thing i want in Pirmasens is to met all these crazy SWOS-Guys  ;D , drink some beer and play SWOS 

@ Playaveli  I think it is not necessary to reply every opinion of every post here in forum  Only MY OPINION , hehe :

Best regards
Have fun

@ Pallister: new rule (diy league) - brings too much luck (some people said it!) - so finally it is unfair (if injuries really happen).
But this is only my interpretation of the last 6 pages!

Why is nearly everyone so afraid of injuries? My problem will be the tons of yellow/red cards...^^

If your player gets injured, just tackle back or stop those 50m-solo-dribblings to avoid injuries,..... etc.
There are so many ways to handle these new settings but badmouthing is always easier then solving something.

Oh pls stop using badmouthing as a word , this is just a exchange of opinions, for what forum is for.

Ok, then I say that it won t be only luck to keep your squad intact. It is just a little factor. You have different ways to reduce injuries.

It s an unfair rule compared to a more fair group rule based on the fact people start with same chances at min 0 in every game, no handicap.
If you don t recognize reasons as reasons but as bad mouthing or whatever you prefer , well, i guess it s your problem.

Then it s clear , that is your cup you can do what you want, but i don t understand why you take it that way, people are saying their opinions and you treat them like it is some sort of aggression...when it s really not.

You and redhair talk about judging this and that . Nobody is judging anything, nobody s judging a future event...that is also ...impossible thing to do.
You can make , maybe , some predictions, but this is definitely NOT the case.
Don t put words you like in other people s mouth , that s incorrect, useless and wrong.
Sensidays , i am sure , will be an awesome event, but may someone say his opinion that maybe that rule doesn t suit the concept of sensidays as the ultimate competition like many of us like it to see, because i think competing with luck involved (i mean more luck than we are used to and we accept as part of swos, here in ss.de) is not a good way to compete at the highest level;
if a rule is not fair from my point of view, where fairness is for me to be sure i can compete with equal chances at min.0 , i claim the right to say my opinion in this forum.
I am not trying to change your rules, i am saying HOW i see that rule in the context of the hardest tournament ever.
More the luck is involved , less the skills count, but that doesn t necessarily mean random results (probably the best will prevail anyway), it just means that there s the possibility (POSSIBILITY) that a player could start without a key player from min. 0. That means he could start a game with some sort of handicap (injured player , black cross, red cross , whatever) he doesn t deserve, just because computer said so...